Exam Strategy Trainer
England & Wales · SRA SQE1 & SQE2 technique
Identify
Identify every legal issue raised by the facts. Don't just pick the obvious one.
Rule
State the applicable rule of law precisely. Quote the statute or case principle.
Apply
Apply the rule to the specific facts. Don't just restate the law.
Eliminate
Eliminate distractors. Wrong answers usually contain a true statement of law applied to the wrong facts.
Open with a clear statement of the relief sought and the legal basis.
Structure submissions logically: opening → facts → law → application → conclusion.
Address the weaknesses in your own case proactively.
Cite relevant cases or statutory provisions precisely (Acts of Parliament, not US codes).
Close with a concise summary of why the court should find in your client's favour.
Client-focused language throughout
Identify the issue clearly at the outset
Apply law to your client's specific facts
Give a clear, unambiguous advice
Flag any risks or uncertainties
Recommend next steps
Use plain English — avoid Latin
UK spelling and terminology only
Correct document type and structure
Parties correctly named and described
All operative clauses present
Consideration stated (contracts)
No ambiguous language
Consistent defined terms
English law governing clause (where relevant)
Professional conduct obligations satisfied
The most common trap: knowing the rule but missing the exception. Always ask: 'Does an exception apply?'
The rule is accurate but applied to the wrong party, time, or situation. Read every fact carefully.
Substantive law correct, but procedure wrong (time limits, service, court level).
Research shows first instincts are usually right. Only change if you have a positive reason to, not just doubt.